Scaly, The Preacher, and McKook 4/28/09 Antonin Scalia was on “60 Minutes” last night. Scaly always reminds me of Benito Mussolini, and it isn’t just that he has an Italian background. He swaggers, he smirks, he’s charming, he’s intelligent, and he’s a vicious clown. Just like Benito.

But Leslie Stahl, the presenter who interviewed him, isn’t the sort to get a case of the vapors when confronted with Il Duce, and she kept raising questions. Scaly, backed into a corner, finally resorted to desperate lying, claiming, among other things, that Gore brought the case before the SC (Bush did), and that the decision to end “the nonsense” of the Florida courts (which the FSC had already done) “wasn’t even close” (but it -was- moot) and that “Bush would have won anyway." The vote to end the recount because time was running out was 5-4. The court delayed the count inexplicably for three days before announcing that, and somehow failed to notice that the deadline for certification (which 2/3rds of the states usually miss anyway) takes a back seat to ensuring a full and accurate count of the vote. Not that Scaly wanted such.

Right. Mugabe would have won anyway. Never mind that the record showed differently.

Scaly has been on a big charm offensive lately, but I don’t think it’s working. It’s the sneering and the strutting, you see. People who swoon at the sight of fascistic swagger are already firm believers. The rest of us know he’s just a clown who sucked up the to the right demagogues and attained a position he never should have been allowed near.
Britney, Britney, Britney 2/18/08 Today’s column is about Britney Spears.

Wait! Wait! Don’t hit that delete key! I’m joking!

I’m actually going to start out talking about David Little. He’s the editor of the Chico Enterprise-Record. Armando Acuña, who became the Public Editor of the Sacramento Bee after a poll revealed that 72% of Americans thought an ombudsman was either a way of preparing potatoes, or someone who likes to have sex with potatoes, wrote about David Little today.

Little got fed up with the amount of media attention that was being lavished on Spears, and, as her personal odyssey shifted from farce to personal tragedy, more than a little sickened. So he decided his paper was just going to stop covering her. She wasn’t, in the greater scheme of things, newsworthy. According to Acuña, he openly declared the paper “a Britney-free zone” back on January 20th.

Then he waited for the response to pile in.

A few readers wrote to praise the decision. Not one single reader protested. In the four weeks since, there have been several media frenzies about the unfortunate Spears, all of which the Chico paper ignored. Nobody called up to wank that the paper wasn’t serving the public interest. Since Chico has access to the internet, cable and satellite TV, tabloids and am radio, it has to be assumed that word got around that there was Britney stuff going on, and the elitist bastards at the paper were denying the public’s right to know!
The NY Times Takes Kristol Meth 1/1/08 On the last day of a bad year, the New York Times decided to get up on its hind legs and pretend it was a bastion of journalistic freedom and ethics. It ran an editorial called “Looking at America,” and it contained a clarion call for “the Constitution, the rule of law and human decency.” The Times thundered sternly about how Putsch “squandered America’s position of moral and political leadership, swept aside international institutions and treaties, sullied America’s global image, and trampled on the constitutional pillars.” The Times thundered about the often-disgraceful behavior of troops in Afghanistan and Iraq, the national humiliation of Gitmo and a gulag of “interrogation camps” spread across Asia and Europe under some of the scummiest regimes to be found on the face of the earth. Finally, blaming the American people for all this, it expressed the mild hope that they might choose better in the next election.

This is the same New York Times that was one of the Putsch junta’s greatest enablers from 2000 onward. They blamed the horror of 9/11 for the subsequent actions of the administration (and the subtext was that they blamed 9/11 for their own inability to resist it), but the fact is these dirtbags in the GOP were planning what amounted to a fascist takeover of the US years before 9/11. Indeed, 9/11 was so convenient for the Putsch junta’s aims that millions of people believe that the Putsch junta let 9/11 happen, or were even involved in planning it.

The New York Times, which spent 2000 repeating every smear and mockery from the far right about Al Gore while ignoring the obvious fact that George W. Bush was a moron unfit to pump gas let alone lead the country, likes to pretend that they were forced to tone down their non-existent attacks on the administration, lest anyone think they favored the terrorists.

This is the New York Times that, rather than rock the boat, reluctantly printed the results of the NORC Survey, which showed that by every legitimate and legal state-wide recount method used, Al Gore won Florida in 2000. However, they posted it under the headline, “Survey shows Bush won Florida.” They based this on the fact that had Gore prevailed in limiting the recount to just the four counties (which the Florida Supreme Court struck down as a violation of the “one man one vote” principle) he would have lost.
A Dirty Cave-In 11/13/07 The minute the GOP decided to made an overt play to bring the apolitical religious evangelicals into the political fold, they sealed their fate.

It wasn’t that the god-struck made good political allies. They do, until they decide that God wants them to do something else, at which point they don’t. Political loyalty always takes a back seat to religious purity. They’ll ring doorbells and man the phone banks against any party as easily as they will for it, depending on the ecumenical breezes.

Nor will they bolt if you begin abrading people’s freedoms. The religious sorts pay only cursory attention to the rights contained in the Constitution, because they aren’t contained in the Bible, and in the case of the Dominionists, who believe Jesus has sovereignty over the people, those rights doesn’t pertain at all.

No, what sealed their fate is that the politicians in the GOP are human, and as a result, behave pretty much like humans do. And that, like as not, involves taking one’s sexual organs and doing things with them that, upon reflection, may not have been the wisest courses of action.

Until the religious right was invited in, this wasn’t all that big a deal. After all, if the owner of your local hardware store was caught banging someone else’s wife, you might shake your head over it, but you would keep on doing business there, unless, of course, the wife involved happened to be yours.
Making a Confederacy of Dunces 5/15/07 The other day, Paul Krugman wrote a column called “Don’t Blame Bush.” Drastically boiled down and rendered into varnish, his point was that while Putsch may look and sound like a demented moron, it wasn’t entirely his fault, because the whole fershluggeneh GOP was demented. The eleven lawn jockeys at the Faux/GOP debate promised nothing but More of the Same (with the exception of Ron Paul, who the GOP wants to ban from future debates). Krugman pointed to the candidates’ debate as an example, in which 10 of the 11 candidates applauded the gulag at Guatanamo. (Guiliani even said he would “double” it, leading an ecstatic Jon Stewart to shout, “He landed the double Guantanamo! No one’s ever done that before!”). Stewart watched the debate and saw the same thing that Krugman apparently did: that some or all of the eleven clones standing there must have forgotten to pay their brain bills or something, because they all sounded like drooling idiots.

This all came out on the same day that Al Gore’s new book, “The Assault on Reason” came out. It deals with the ignorance and stupidity – often willful – that has become so prevalent in US politics. Gore’s book reminds us all that the powers of viciousness and stupidity overcame the will of the American people in 2000, and installed a man who can’t even read a book, let alone write one. Gore also notes that far too many people are complacently happy to be led by people who think evolution is a secular hoax, or that scientists have a political agenda but that politicians don’t.

Having GOP candidates sound like drooling idiots isn’t exactly new. They wouldn’t be where they are today if they didn’t sound like drooling idiots. Look at the White House. Would Present Occupant be there if he hadn’t managed to convince a lot of drooling idiots that he was the kind of guy they would like to sit down and have a beer with? Nothing at all like that guy Gore, with his correct English and ability to name the capitals of foreign countries like Canada and New Mexico!
The Sinking of the Swift Boaters 2/18/07 The LA Times had an item, repeated in part by Raw Story, about GOP plans to launch one of their patented vicious smear campaigns against Senator Hillary Clinton. Raw Story wrote, “Braun reports that ‘a flurry of planned projects’ include ‘a Michael Moore-style documentary film, book-length exposes, and websites such as StopHerNow.com and StopHillaryPAC.com. ‘Conservative admirers of the Swift Vets and POWs for Truth media blitz that helped torpedo Democratic Sen. John F. Kerry's presidential candidacy in 2004 are now agitating to 'Swift-boat' Clinton,’ Braun writes.”

I can’t wait to see the “Michael Moore-style documentary film.” Maybe they could get Dennis Miller to wander around a sweatshop, trying to get employees to admit that not only do they get medical coverage in full, but that their employers even paid for their children’s college tuition. Someone’s got to hold those powerful workers accountable for the terrible mistreatment they unthinkingly inflict on poor little multinational corporations!

Guerrilla humor used to work well for Rush when the right wing was out on the fringes and largely ignored. It became simply bullying and mean when the far right seized control of the country. Times change, tempus frangit and all that, and the right wing is failing to change with it. What worked well in 1994 and 1998 didn’t work as well in 2004, and won’t work at all in 2008.

Part of the change lies in how elections are covered. Much has been made of the rise of the blogosphere, and bloggers proclaim, occasionally with justification, that they “keep the media honest.” Of course, the blogs tend to screw up frequently; right wing bloggers mostly fell for the myths about Obama being raised as a Moslem, or that Pelosi wanted a 757 to fly about the country. And on the left, there was the myth of Rove being indicted and that Gore was going to announce his candidacy at the Oscars.
The Sinking of the 109 12/8/06 There was a quote the other day from a Republican that tells you just about everything you need to know about the sort of people who have taken over and infested the GOP.

First, take note of the fact that the 109th Congress was considered a “do-nothing” Congress. It rubber-stamped Putsch as he led the country into two catastrophic wars, passed the Patriot Act unread, and failed to address a single problem that anyone making less than $100,000 a year might encounter. It convened for less days than any Congress in modern times.

In short, it was lazy, doctrinaire, and incompetent. You can’t even say both parties are responsible, because the GOP simply steamrollered over parliamentary procedure and left the Democrats with no voice – and thus no responsibility – for the horrible track record it wrapped up.

This Congress, when it bothered to meet at all, met for Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday of the weeks it was in session, devoting the rest to fund raising and figuring out ways to steal more of the national wealth for their corporate masters.
A War for Dummies 11/2/06 One of the Weasels, not one given to conspiracy theories, read about Kerry’s “punted joke” gaffe, sighed, and remarked, “At times like this I wonder if the skull-and-bones stories about Kerry being a secret ally of the Bushes aren’t true.” To be sure, the Republicans were absolutely besides themselves with joy that a Democrat allegedly insulted the fighting men and women in Iraq by implying they were stupid.

Of course, lost in the foofooraw was the fact that Kerry did NOT say, or even imply, that the troops were stupid. In fact, he wasn’t even talking about those serving in Iraq. He made a remark about how Putsch used to live in Texas but now “lives in a state of denial,” and then said of the C-Student Putsch, “You know, education, if you make the most of it, you study hard, you do your homework and you make an effort to be smart, you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq.”

The GOP, desperate for any distraction, decided to simply lie about what Kerry said, aided by the GOP sounding boards in Faux and CNN, and noted without question by the mainstream media, the most worthless and overpaid group of entities in America outside of corporate boardrooms.
 

Why I Wasn't At the Demonstration

10/5/06 There were demonstrations today planned to protest against the Putsch junta across the country. I hope they were well-attended and accomplished their aim of expressing discontent with the junta for all the crimes it has committed and the incompetence with which it has managed its affairs. The demonstrations also targeted Democrats who have been war hawks and supported some of Putsch’s other disastrous policies, which is a good thing. If you haven’t heard, don’t be surprised. The ‘liberal media’ isn’t talking about it.

I was planning on attending the local one, scheduled to begin at 3pm today. It’s not like I’ve never demonstrated before; I was at the peace rallies before and after the start of the Iraq invasion, and even addressed the gatherings as a speaker. Years before, I was in the anti-Vietnam War demonstrations and even some riots. In fact, the closest I ever came to a serious brush with the law occurred during one of those riots, in which a bank was burned to the ground and several police cars destroyed, with hundreds arrested. The cops nabbed me, but let me go when I convinced them I was just a poor innocent bystander who came out of a movie theater and was amazed to find a riot going on. It was even half-true. I did, in fact, just leave a movie theater, and I really was surprised to find a riot going on. Of course, what I didn’t mention to the cops was that the movie was “The Strawberry Statement”, a powerful and disturbing look at US policy in Vietnam, and, filled with righteous outrage, I had every intention of joining the riot. Years later, I got into a conversation with a guy who turned out to be one of the cops who let me go. He was retired, and we had a lot of fun drawing maps on napkins and describing who did what to whom on that noisy and chaotic night. Vietnam was ended, Nixon was gone, we were no longer adversaries.

Nixon and John Mitchell and Spiro Agnew were all pretty awful, and we knew back then about Cointelpro and all the other spying and stuff they did with infiltrating anti-war groups and other radical groups like the Audubon Society and Grannies for Nuclear Peace. A lot of people were very angry in those days, and it was a scary time.

 
Another Bad Confluence 9/10/06 As big a public relations nightmare “Path to 9/11" has proved to be for Disney, ABC, and the far right echo chamber, it was actually good news for Putsch, who was going through what might be described as “the week from hell,” or maybe “a bad heir day.” “Path” was a welcome distraction.

First, Putsch wanted to show the world that he was willing to be tough on terrorism, and so he submitted a new military tribunal plan that basically was a request for Congress to give the crimes against humanity Putsch was already committing their stamp of approval.

Just to show what a noble and reasonable guy he was, he kind of went “aw shucks,” and owned up to the fact that he had been committing crimes against humanity right along and lying to everyone about it.

That George! What a kidder!
Where are the Republicans? 7/11/06 Magginkat, one of the commentators at the Mytown.ca webside and a fellow Lying Socialist Weasel, wrote an open letter to Senator John Kerry the other day. It began, “Your emails arrive in my mailbox on a regular basis begging for donations. Why? You ‘Cut and Ran’ from the presidential election of 2004 after promising to see that all votes were counted. You allowed that election to be handed to the worst human being who has ever occupied the office in spite of the fact that the statistics showed that you were winning.”

That matched very nearly my reasons why I will never support Kerry again, and why I believe it would be a waste of his and everyone else’s time if he were to run for President in 2008. He had his chance, and when crunch time came, to quote a recent “Get Fuzzy”, “He choked like a chicken gargling a bowling ball.”

Maggie writes terrific copy, and I decided this piece was worth sending along to my news list, which normally includes several folders on Usenet. (For those who missed it, it’s at www.mytown.ca/magginkat)
Tony "One Finger" Scalia 3/28/06 It sounded like one of those moments Jon Stewart lives for. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was at the Cathedral of the Holy Cross, and a reporter had asked him how he would respond to those who questioned his impartiality when it comes to issues separating church and state. "You know what I say to those people?" Scalia replied, making the "obscene gesture, flicking his hand under his chin," the Herald reported. He explained, "That's Sicilian."

Most likely, the “obscene gesture” was the fingertips out from the chin, which can, depending on context, signify amusement, irritation, or the exact same meaning that the American one-finger gesture means, or the British two-finger gesture. Vaffanculo. A pretty Italian phrase that’s a lot nastier than it sounds.

In any event, it made Scaly a fare una figura di merda (Phrases compliments of Insult Mongers, a wonderful website that allows you to cuss and insult in 80 different languages).
One Evening in Texas 2/16/06 To paraphrase the Dead Kennedys, maybe Cheney was “too drunk to duck hunt.”

There’s increasing speculation that Cheney may have been drinking fairly heavily prior to shooting Harry Whittington. It wouldn’t exactly be the first time in history that alcohol played a role in a hunting accident, and the possibility that Cheney was tipsy when the shooting occurred would explain some of the biggest mysteries about the whole thing, including how it happened in the first place, and why no cops were allowed to talk to Cheney about it for an entire day afterward.

Granted, law enforcement in Texas is basically pretty worthless. They are there to lean on the poor and minorities viciously, in order to keep them in line, and beyond that, serve no useful social purpose.

Imagine if some well-dressed guy in Texas was veering wildly down a Dallas street at 60 miles an hour, and plows into a parked school bus, injuring several of the kids. Two Texas cops witness this. They look at each other.

“That was a Caddy, wasn’t it?”

“Shore was. And the driver was white.”

“Well, let’s make sure he’s ok, and see if he needs a lift home. I don’t think that Caddy’s going anywhere for a while.”
Cheney Bags His Limit 2/14/06 Legend has it that in the wild and wooly clichés after Texas “won independence” (was stolen) from Mexico and before it became part of the Confederate States, there was a law in Texas that said that if you shot a politician, you could walk away a free man if you could convince a jury that the son of a bitch had it coming.

Now, you might think that a law like that would lead to a certain shortage of politicians, and to be sure, there would be an initial rush of enthusiasm. Everyone, after all, has their own “better-dead” list, and some would be eager for an opportunity to try their powers of persuasion in front of a jury. Even if they failed to convince the jury, the world would be spinning right along with one less politician, so it would balance out.

But there is an endless supply of politicians, and Texas politics being what they are, the really slimy politicians, the ones who could benefit the most from a few friendly rounds into the cerebellum, would be leading the shooting parties, convincing the good folk that any politician who wasn’t stealing with both hands must be up to something really dastardly, and folks would be potshotting the honest politicians at the behest of the dirt balls, in the name of God and the Flag.

So the idea faded away, pushed no doubt by a general lack of good results and a desire to civilize Texas, perhaps the most foolish and fore-doomed idea in human history.

Which brings us, to nobody’s surprise, to Dick Cheney. Or, as the British press has taken up calling him, Duck Cheney.
Spy vs. Spy 1/29/06 The good news is that the American people can’t possibly be as stupid as George W. Putsch thinks they are.

The bad news is that still leaves room for an awful lot of stupid.

In the continuing saga over domestic spying (corporate media-speak for “illegal wiretapping”), Putsch has come out with a new gambit. “I can do it” didn’t seem to convince the public that yes, he can do it. “I checked with Congress” didn’t work when Congress chorused, “No you didn’t.” “The Constitution says I can do it” didn’t work, because anyone with half a brain could tell you that the fourth amendment expressly says he can’t do it. “I’m only spying on terrorists” didn’t work, since it was unlikely that there were millions of terrorists inside the United States. If there are, all the wiretaps in the world can’t save the government now. For better or for worse, though, it’s pretty unlikely that there’s as many as 1,000 terrorists in America, and most of those wouldn’t talk to a member of al-Qaida for any reason in the world. What’s more, they are all-American terrorists who usually vote Republican. When they aren’t preparing for the coming Race War or figuring out new ways to make abortionists pay for their sins.

So the latest gambit is to ask permission while not admitting that he acted improperly. Although he’s already warned Congress that he won’t explain why he needs permission, for security reasons. (Oddly enough, the same reason was proffered for withholding documents relating to federal response on Katrina: Jon Stewart wryly suggested that if they released documents on how to deal with hurricanes, future hurricanes would know our weaknesses.)
When the Media Sells Out 1/23/06 Deborah Howell, ombudsman for the once-proud Washington Post, started her latest column thusly: “Nothing in my 50-year career prepared me for the thousands of flaming e-mails I got last week over my last column, e-mails so abusive and many so obscene that part of The Post's Web site was shut down.”

Apparently, in her 50 year career, she did nothing to tick off the right. If she had, she might have found her home address posted on the internet, and efforts to convince the world that she was mad, a dangerous radical, a partisan liar, or all three.

But somehow, in 50 years, she never managed to tick off the right wing. Truly amazing. She might want to talk to Dan Rather, who is routinely accused of deliberately fabricating evidence against Putsch and his national guard record. Or more recently, Walter Cronkite, who drew ire from the right when he said that the war in Iraq could not be won the other day. “Senile old buffoon” was one of the kinder remarks.

She might pay a visit to Free Republic, where junior brownshirts discuss how best to intimidate, pressure, coerce and smear journalists seen as having a leftist tilt. This would include such “leftists” as CNN, and yes, the Washington Post.

Indeed, in the past 50 years, the drive to intimidate and manipulate the media started with a campaign against the Washington Post, in the form of Spiro Agnew, who complained incessantly about “the liberal media” and their “nattering nabobs of negativism.” Some papers blinked, and the right realized they had a valuable weapon: the media could be tamed and turned into something the right could ride. We’re at the point now where reporters for once-mighty CBS news talk about “our brave troops fighting for our freedoms in Iraq.” It isn’t far removed from reverential references to “Our Glorious Leader” as some news outlets continue their practice of passing along stories from GOP fax machines as news stories.
When the Center Sells Out 1/21/06 Friday night, and I was just settling in to start work on my column for My Town, and decided to check my email. Jim had sent me a copy of Molly Ivins’ latest, “I will not support Hillary Clinton for president.” I read carefully and with considerable enjoyment, as I always do with Molly, and then wrote Jim back, saying, “Well, I can tear up Saturday's essay. Molly beat me to it.”

I wondered if Molly read Bartcop. He’s been vociferously championing Clinton as the Democratic candidate in ‘08, even defending her pro-war record. And he is offering the same argument that the centrists – and the GOP spin machine – have been feeding us: a liberal can’t get elected, you have to go to the right.

The only trouble is that the Democratic Party has been trying that since 1972, and all it’s done is give the GOP victory after victory. Carter won in 76 only because of lingering public outrage over the Watergate scandal, and Bill Clinton won in 1992 because he had a campaign team that was willing to go toe to toe with the right wing smear machine (which isn’t nearly as viciously refined as it is today) and in 1996 because he was an incumbent facing a hopelessly weak GOP candidate. And yes, I know the Democratic candidates won in 2000 and 2004, but neither were willing to fight when the chips were on the table, and they let Putsch steal it.

Whether she reads Bartcop or not, she’s right, and Bartcop isn’t. Tossing up another weak centrist isn’t going to address any problems, and this time around, the left won’t give its support. Even without the war, Hillary lost that constituency when she went soft on the flag-burning amendment, the tax cuts, and abortion rights.
Pearl Harbor and 9/11 12/27/05 One of the favorite stances people writing about the attacks on 9/11/01 like to take is that of comparing the attacks to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941. There’s comfort in that, because there’s widespread belief among Americans that the nation responded by jumping to its collective feet with an angry roar, and promptly thrashed the Germans and the Japanese, saved the Jews and England, and made the Germans stop behaving like Europeans.

People like to cling to that, even though things haven’t gone exactly the way things went after Pearl Harbor. It has been four years, four months, and sixteen days since 9/11. In terms of time after Pearl Harbor, that would be the equivalent date of April 23rd, 1946. Hitler and FDR were both dead over a year by that point, Japan was taking the first steps toward regaining self rule without the military involved, and the world was making a slow recovery from the years of madness.

In America, people were finally believing that the end of the war didn’t mean the return of the depression, and in fact, America was beginning the biggest economic boom in her history.

In other words, in the amount of time that we’ve seen since 9/11, America had fought World War II, and everything was settling back into a peaceful prosperity.
One Dog, One Bite 12/18/05 Perhaps the most shocking thing about the New York Times, once the “paper of record”, admitting it sat for a year on a story of a president committing impeachable felony acts is that so few of us are shocked any more.

The Times had taken several body blows to its credibility in recent years. Recently, Judith Miller disgraced herself and subverted the paper to advance the right wing interests of the hawks in the Putsch junta. Right wingers like to cite plagiarist Jayson Blair, who subverted the paper for his own interests.

Newspapers make mistakes. Papers are sometimes victimized by reporters who turn out to have shoddy standards or who are flat-out dishonest. I even once wrote a piece praising Diana Griego Erwin, a columnist for the Sacramento Bee who, the paper discovered several years later, had been frequently fabricating quotes and entire interviews. All enterprises get inept or corrupt employees. The good newspapers take pains to try to detect such and weed them out before they do much damage, and let their readers know what happened.

Lying to their readers, either by commission or by omission, is a crime that can never be forgiven. In sitting on the story about Putsch wiretapping people domestically without a warrant for a full year (and through an election cycle), the New York Times deliberately lied to its readers, and to the American people.
Scalito's Way 11/03/05 Lest anyone despair for the Republic in the wake of the Scalito (aka Samuel Alito) nomination, a Gallup poll today should give most Americans a ray of hope, and the Democrats the backbone they’ll need to resist the lies, attacks and smears of the GOP echo chamber.

    The poll showed that a large number of Americans would oppose Scalito if it became clear that he would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. Not just a plurality: most. The margin, Gallup was surprised to report, was 53-37%.

    By only a slightly smaller margin, most would support a Democratic filibuster to stop the nomination. The points on that were 50-40%.  

    Republicans have been crowing that the American people would not stand for Democrats being obstructionists. Obviously that is not the case. People expect the Senate to do its job and protect them from letting the religious right slip a dangerous radical onto the highest court in the land.
GOP Math 9/23/05 You know the Republican Study Committee was working on major budget revisions, right?

You didn’t? Well, don’t be surprised. Not many people did. Not that the Republican Study Committee is a dusty little collection of policy wonks from obscure right wing think tanks. It’s made up of 86 members of the House Republican caucus (Democrats aren’t allowed to be a part of the budget process, of course, since under the neofascist right, a 51% majority translates to absolute rule), and the chairman is Mike Pense, and the Budget & Spending Task Force Chair is Jeb Hensarling.

They got around to realizing that it was getting a little embarrassing, what with the GOP for years proclaiming that they were the party of fiscal responsibility, and it was them who were blowing the federal budget out of the water in ways that nobody had ever seen before. Worse, eight years of a Democratic White House had gone a long way toward repairing the damage done by Reagan and Bush, and the general public had gotten around to noticing that Democrats did a much better job fiscally than the Republicans could.

So the Republican Study Committee decided that something had to be done about that. After seeing the government grow by 33% in the past four years and deficits explode to record levels and nothing but vast amounts of red ink as far as the eye could see, these 86 party stalwarts actually had enough political sense to feel slight embarrassment, and more substantial concern that voters might be annoyed enough to cast more incorrect votes than they could steal.
A Deathly Silence 8/16/05 Larry Northern managed to silence the far right for a day or two.

If the name doesn’t ring a bell, Larry is the fellow who decided to hook a pipe lengthwise behind his pickup truck so it would drag along behind him like a little steamroller, and went blasting though all the crosses and other grave markers that Cindy Sheehan and the other anti-war vigilists had erected at the protest site. Of the 1,800 markers, 500 were knocked down, and 100 destroyed. Poor old Larry tried to make his escape after this bold action, but one of those pesky crosses flattened one of his tires, with the result that the local police caught him, red-bumpered, so to speak. (Fortunately, he didn’t actually injure anyone while doing this).

David Icke 7/27/05 Back about two years ago, one of my friends loaned me a videotape about the Illuminati. My interest level wasn’t very high, but television being what it is, I found time to plug it into the VCR and give it a watch.

It consisted of this blond-headed limey wandering around downtown London and prattling on about the Illuminati and the New World Order and bank conspiracies and the like. But he had an engaging style, and sounded a bit more intelligent than your typical conspiracy nutter.

But then he started talking about how the Bushes and the Queen of England and others were all secretly extraterrestrial lizards, and how that was why there were so many statues of dragons scattered about London. At that point, I turned the TV off, and went and wrote an essay, successfully managing, once again, to not allege that the Queen of England had a problem with her tail dropping off when molested by a house cat. Well, after all, I have to have some sort of standards.

What it Is, Is 7/13/05 Remember how right wingers used to howl and moan endlessly about the famous Clinton quote, "It depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is"? It was supposed to represent Clinton duplicity and pettifogging.

All Clinton was doing was asking for clarification of a question put to him during a court deposition, something any lawyer would tell his client he must do in a deposition if he isn’t crystal clear on what is being asked of him. All completely straightforward and legitimate.

Any notion that Clinton was being sneaky or devious by asking for that clarification belongs in the tall pile of utter bullshit that the right-wing likes to try to convert into truth through constant repetition, along with all the discredited Clinton "scandals" such as travelgate, Whitewater, and Paula Jones, or the infamous $200 haircut story.

Schiavo III 6/21/05 It doesn’t look like the Terri Schiavo case is ready to settle down any time soon. Like Terri herself, the argument lingers on well past the point where it could have been laid to rest.

One of the more moderate voices came from right winger John Leo, of the U.S. News and World Report. Unlike many of the right-to-life crowd, he actually admits that the autopsy proved there was "extraordinary damage" to Terri’s brain, and that it also showed that her husband, Michael, had not abused her. Mind you, this is one of the more moderate voices from the right.

The Shadow Media 6/6/05 The Sacramento Bee has what is now called a "Public Editor". Until recently, the position was called the "Ombudsman" but it turned out that 15 out of every 12 readers thought an ombudsman was a Buddhist monk who pruned the roses at the local nursery, so they changed the name to reflect modern intellectual capabilities.

The new Public Editor is Armando AcuZa, and he’s off to a good start in his job, which consists, in the main, of providing an independent analysis of how the Bee does its job as a newspaper for the benefit of the readers, while addressing questions, concerns and complaints that readers have about the Bee. He came at a difficult time for the newspaper, when its star columnist, Diana Griego Erwin, resigned after allegations arose over her methods used in providing quotes and background in her (usually) human-interest columns. The Bee stated that they had run spot checks on a dozen or so of her recent columns, attempting to track down sources she used, and in a dismayingly high percentage of such cases, were unable to find evidence that the people named actually existed.

Darth Condoleezza? 5/26/05 There’s a new Star Wars movie out. You may have heard mention of it in passing. It’s pretty typical of the franchise: great settings, fantastic action sequences, lame dialogue, and acting that leaves you glancing at the bottom of the screen to see what the silhouettes of Joel and the ‘Bots are saying. 

Now the plot is fairly basic. There’s this Galactic Republic, see, and it’s been fighting an insurgency for some time, apparently over a trade dispute. George Lucas went into long and involved detail about these trade disputes in the previous two Star Wars movies, since political analysis of trade disputes is something no red-blooded eight year old boy can resist. Maybe you remember what the hell they were about, because I sure don’t. Nor do I want to, so don’t email me.
Newsweak 5/18/05 As soon as I heard that Newsweak had retracted its story alleging disrespectful treatment of the Q’uran at Guantánamo Bay Gulag, I knew the final decision had been made, not by the managing editor or even the editorial board, but by corporate suits.

You see, here’s the thing about suits, and it’s why having them own journalistic endeavors is such a grotesque travesty. They are timid. They are easily cowed by an uproar, by a bunch of complaints, by anything that can hurt profits. The media needs to be fair and fearless, and corporate suits are neither. Corporate suits can make a nation strong, but they can never make a nation great.

Timid.

The Fall of the American Media 5/14/05 Bartcop had a link to an article at Arab News  which stated that an outfit calling itself "Freedom House" had rated the world’s media, and that in terms of having a free press, America ranked only 27th in the world.

That the free press in America has taken a catastrophic plunge over the past 15 years is pretty much beyond dispute. One can spend a few days reading the Washington Post and realize that the glory days of Woodward and Bernstein are long passed. One can read its crosstown rival, the Washington Times, and realize that some segments of the American press are no better than the once-ridiculed Pravda of the Soviet era.

The Squirrel Parade 3/27/05 This is about the Terri Schiavo case, but I’m not going to say much more about that poor woman’s long-deferred death. It’s well-trodden ground, and my readers know where they stand on the issue, and don’t need me to repeat where I stand.

It’s just that since I wrote about her last week, her case has mushroomed into a minor constitutional crisis. Just to give you some idea, the Miami Herald reported, somewhat incredulously, that Governor Jeb Bush thought that the Florida Supreme Court taking the Schiavo case under advisement on Thursday somehow created a window of opportunity in which he could legally send troops to forcibly wrest Schiavo from the Hospice and take her to a nearby hospital where doctors could be forced to reinsert her feeding tube. The police who are guarding Terri and the Hospice from all the chanting lunatics out front were lined up, prepared to face off against the governor’s cops. This confrontation, one unheard of in American history, was averted when the hospital made it clear that it would not treat Terri without an explicit court order, and Bush backed down.

The nuts out front of the hospice have been sending their own children in to be arrested. A seven year old girl, carrying a plastic glass of water to give to Terri, seemed to be under the impression that her husband should be in jail for "being bossy." I wonder if that poor kid’s parents, who cravenly hung back among their fellow crackpots, knew that if that kid had somehow gotten to Terri Schiavo and tried pouring the water in her mouth, Schiavo would have almost certainly drowned? If they did know, then horsewhipping them is too good for what they did to their poor daughter.

Libertarian Cant 2/27/05 Most people have at least a passing familiarity with Libertarian philosophy. Libertarians believe that the smaller the government, the better, and that the sovereign rights of the individual citizen are paramount. On most social issues, they are liberals, with the main divergence from liberal thought coming in the notion that they believe social services should be in the domain of the private sector (and thus run on a for-profit basis) as opposed to public sector.

Based on this, you would think that Libertarians would absolutely despise the Putsch regime, with its massive increases in federal spending and debt, the PATRIOT ACT, and the invitation to intrusive and suffocating Christian fundamentalists to manage the affairs of the citizenry for them.

You would be right. Libertarians absolutely hate that. But they only make up about 5% of the people who are claiming to be Libertarians. It really isn’t a very popular philosophy.
Privatization 2/2/05 Tonight is the State of the Union address, something that always gives me and all the other commentators on the web fun things to write about.

In the days of Clinton, it was a bit harder to write on, because the most arresting elements of the speech were visual. Clinton would stand there and orate, showing an amazing command of facts, figures, policies and repercussions. The Republicans would sit there with expressions on their faces like that of non-Norwegians being force-fed lutefisk. Rectally. Newt would visibly deflate. It was lots of fun.

I guess they’ve been trying to foist George Dub off as an intellectual who does a lot of reading and decision-making and other what you call your leadership stuff lately. This strikes me as one of Karl Rove’s more misbegotten ideas, and will implode the first time the kid strikes out on his own and ad libs within earshot of a reporter that he had that Edger Allan Poe fellow over for dinner last week and thought he was a real swell guy. At which point Rove will croak, "Nevermore."

Putsch-Speak 1/23/05 Much has been made of the fact that Putsch used the words "freedom" and "liberty" so much in his coronation babble. One count put it at 37 "freedom"s and 21 "liberty"s in the short, content-free speech. Given that the weapons of mass destruction fizzled and the American occupiers managed to get many Iraqis to think of Saddam as "the good old days," Putsch has had to settle for just libertying and freedoming the holy living shit out of Iraq. So you would think he would mention Iraq as an example of how he has brought freedom and liberty to the world.

He didn’t.

The Washington Generals 1/7/05

The Democratic Party has sold out. It has become the Washington Generals to the GOP's Harlem Globetrotters.

The Democrats know the GOP stole the 2000 election, and they seem to have concluded that if they just agreed to GOP demands to eliminate the paper trail, the GOP wouldn't steal the 2004 election. Idiots.

After a long and determined effort to get one senator, just one, to object to the certification of the electoral college vote based on the wide spread failures and irregularities in the Ohio vote, a total of one – count ‘em, one – Democrat did so. Credit where credit is due: Barbara Boxer has more courage than the rest of the Democrats in the Senate combined, and more character than the whole sorry lot in the Senate, even if you don’t bring down the curve by counting Dick Cheney.

"You Might be a Liberal if..." 12/31/04 Every so often, you see a prefab list of whines from various right-wingers that have titles like "Liberals believe..." or "Ten signs you might be a left-winger," and so on. Every once in a while I have fun deconstructing those, or doing a mirror image "Conservatives believe..." or "Nine signs you might be a right winger" (#10 is : You can’t count to ten).

Ed Lynch, a right wing columnist for Roanoke.com has the latest variation on such lists, and is honest enough to give credit for the format to Jeff Foxworthy.

His is better than most such lists (most are on the level of "You might be a liberal if you hate America, God, and apple pie"), and worth examining. Following my usual format, we’ll have his one liners, and my responses [I clipped his introduction and some, but not all, of his goofier claims about liberals]. The astute reader may be able to discern the difference between his claims and my responses.

You might be a liberal if …

Voltaire's Prayer 12/11/04 As the doors rapidly slam shut on freedom in America, one sees remarks and observations that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago. For example, CBC, the Canadian Broadcast Corporation, has a four-part series on relations with the US that contains the question, "Will the post-9/11 security state mean detentions, deportations, and ‘secret trials’ for Canadians traveling in the U.S.?" (The title of the documentary series is "Canada and the New American Empire" and shows a flag that consists of the white field with a red field on each side, with a large blue American star where the red maple leaf would go, and in it, a small white maple leaf) Maureen Farrell wrote an essay  where she showed a direct correlation between Putsch’s thoughts on Christianity and the role of religion in state affairs, and how they were nearly identical with those of Adolf Hitler. (The idea isn’t original to Ms. Farrell; it shows up in my signature file that I’ve used for the past month and predates that by several years. But she did a brilliant job of showing just how disturbingly pervasive that correlation is).

On "The Daily Show" Jon Stewart showed Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf stating flatly that the invasion of Iraq was a mistake, followed a few minutes later by a rattled-looking Wolf Blitzer coming on to explain to his docile cable audience that he had been told that when Musharraf had called attacking Iraq a "mistake" he hadn’t meant it quite as "unconditionally" as it sounded. Protect that "access," Wolf; it’s your bread and butter, and I don’t guess those red leather pumps and matching red satin hotpants come cheap, do they? Especially with all the wear and tear of being a member of America’s fourth estate.

The Smoking Gun 11/7/04 In Baker County, where 69.3% of the voters are registered as Democratic, Bush supposedly won by a 7,738 to 2,180 margin. For this to be possible, Bush would have had to have gotten the votes of every single Republican and 4,500 of the roughly 7,000 Democrats and independents.

In Calhoun County, where 82.4% of voters are Democrat, Putsch won the vote by a 3,780 to 2,116 margin. There are less than a thousand Republicans in that county.

Bradford County: 61.4% Democrat, Putsch won 7,553 to 3,244.

In Dixie county, roughly 1,500 Republicans were able to deliver 4,433 votes for Putsch. The 7,700 Democrats only had 1,959.

Winding Up by Winding Down 10/28/04 Usually, about now, the propaganda machine of the GOP is running full tilt, and voters are being buried in an avalanche of propaganda, one designed to reinforce the determination of supporters while raising doubts and sapping the will among Democrats.

I remember back about eight years ago, the Queen of the Weasels, noting the flood of GOP agitprop on the airwaves being dutifully repeated as news by a manipulated and compliant media, sighed, "I hate that they can do this and we don’t fire back at them."

Of course, that was 1996, and Clinton won anyway, since Bob Dole was busily running against Bob Dole. And the Democrats were fairly adept at their own agitprop, even without VRWC radio and easily suckered reporters. They managed to create the impression that Bob Dole’s running mate, or his father, was Newt Gingrich.

Republicans vs. Democrats 10/20/04 I wasn’t planning on writing an essay at 5:30 in the morning.

It was just that on Usenet, a right winger posted one of those "us vs. them" things that are so popular with both sides. This one (and I have no idea who "Immortalist" is, or if he was the author or not) was written just well enough to draw a response from me.

In the interests of openness, the responses to the "Republicans believe" segments are, with grammatical editing, as I wrote when I responded to the post. The responses to "Democrats believe" were added after the fact.

Patsies 9/25/04 Ah, you gotta love those Republican morals.

Yusef Islam, who once upon a time was a rock musician named Cat Stevens (and sadly, most of my readers are so old they know who the hell I’m talking about) was turned away at the US border, apparently for being in possession of an Islamic name. Islam, who once supported the fatwa against Salman Rushdie and advocated his death, has mellowed over the years, recanting his ill-considered sentiments and becoming an advocate for peace and a staunch foe of terrorism. That was good enough for the Putsch junta, which declared him a terrorist and said he couldn’t come in to visit. Although two weeks earlier, it was ok.

The very same day, they had the “interim Prime Minister” of the roiling chaos once known as Iraq address a joint session of Congress. Iyad Allawi stood before Congress, receiving the signal honor once reserved for World Leaders such as Winston Churchill, as a man who put his degree in neurology to good use in devising ever more painful forms of torture for Saddam Hussein. More recently, he celebrated being named head puppet for the US by going to the local police station and randomly shooting six prisoners to death as he strolled past their cells. He was here to reassure Congress that Iraq would be free and Democratic by next January. 
Bush on the Couch 9/17/04 Back a few months ago, a Doctor Henry Miller was brought in by the far right to intone that "Al Gore appears to suffer from Narcissistic Personality Disorder, which is not treatable with medications. Consider the diagnostic criteria for this malady: ‘A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts,’ as indicated by the following: ‘a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements).’ Gore demonstrated his grandiosity repeatedly. Who can forget his notorious claim that he had been responsible for creating the Internet?"

Just the last claim, based on the right wing fabrication that Gore said he invented the internet, shows that Miller was an uninformed hack whose "analysis" was no more legitimate than those of fellow revilers Charles Krauthammer ("Al Gore is off his lithium") and Rush Limbaugh.

I was pretty disgusted with the VRWC for the "Al Gore is crazy" campaign, and revolted that a licensed physician would lend his name to such a shoddy undertaking.

Cheney, off to war 9/2/04 Dick Cheney apparently forgot that he got five deferments during the Vietnam war, and eventually knocked up his wife so he wouldn’t have to get a sixth. He forgot that he contemptuously claimed to have more important priorities, like making money.

This was while Kerry was getting shot at, saving lives, and generally being a hero.

Now, Cheney – the same Cheney who spent much of the past three years cowering in bunkers in undisclosed locations – has declared that Kerry is ill-suited to lead America at these times of challenge. Folks, for Cheney to say Kerry is ill-suited to lead America in a time of war is like Homer Simpson saying that Steven Hawking is weak on math, or Peewee Herman saying that Randy Johnson throws like a girl.

Freedom in Amerika 7/25/04 "First Amendment Zones" began the day Putsch seized office. When the motorcade traveled to the Congress for the swearing in ceremony, protesters – by the thousands – were identified and relegated to the zones a few streets away. Government agents ordered the media to not show any protesters that did slip through the cordon sanitaire.

"First Amendment Zones," the Orwellian name for the place where free protest is incarcerated, have been a trademark of this administration, and this brittle, cowardly, sanctimonious president. I first mentioned them in an essay in 2001, identifying them as actually being Second amendment zones, set up because they were so worried Putsch might get shot by his adoring fans.

But we didn’t have Second Amendment Zones in 1964, or in any of the years subsequent to that and before 2001, despite the fact that we had plenty of violent loons with guns who felt that shooting a president could solve their personal problems. Didn’t need them until 2001, nine months before 9/11.

Dirtbags 7/16/04 Lots of cacklin’ and cluckin’ over in the old right wing barnyards on cable TV and in the right wing press this past couple of days.

Seems that Whoopi Goldberg said something rude about the President and female genitalia, and right wingers, who up until now had always thought that Whoopi Goldberg was demure, well-spoken and white, were shocked speechless. Well, speechless except for the incessant yelling and complaining and whinging. 

So what did Whoopi say that upset the right wingers so badly? “Let’s get Bush out of the White House and back where it belongs!” – and then [gasp] she pointed to her crotch. 

With Bushes running for President ever since 1976, I’m amazed nobody ever thought of that one before. Bush. Woman’s crotch. Ha ha ha ha! I’m just heartsick that I didn’t think of it first.
Making Saddam Look Good 7/7/04 I wonder if we’re actually going to see a public trial of Saddam Hussein?

I watched the arraignment or whatever the hell it was the other day, and even before I heard about the responses reporters were getting from jihadi-in-the-street interviews, I realized that the admin had pulled yet another tactical blunder in Iraq.

Saddam was looking pretty sharp, beard neatly trimmed, nice casual threads, dropped a stone or so, clear-eyed and exuding confidence. Even worse, he basically took control of the television cameras, throwing the court on the defensive.

Well, let’s face it; you can’t be the brutal and hated tyrant of a country for over twenty-five years unless you have that sort of presence. In politics, monsters need charisma. Especially monsters. 
It's Miller Time! 6/8/04 “It looks as if Al Gore has gone off his lithium again.”

Charles Krauthammer, a former psychiatrist who apparently abandoned his professional ethics when he abandoned his practice, said that about Al Gore in the wake of Al Gore’s sensational speech at Moveon.org in which he called for the resignation of Rumsfeld and Rice.

Dennis Miller, a former comedian turned partisan failure, said, “At one point I respected Al Gore, but I think he's lost his mind. ... I think he's gone daft because he's a sad little man now.” If you believe Miller had respect for Gore – or any of his betters – I have some Florida voting rolls I want to sell you.

These days, Krauthammer is a journalist for the Washington Post and a frequent contributor to Faux news, which is a polite way of saying he never replaced those professional ethics he dropped when he switched careers.

He’s a part of the trash right, and right now, the trash right is very unhappy with Al Gore.
 
The Death of Reagan 06/06/04 Well, we all knew when Reagan died, we would get hit by an amazing tidal wave of bullshit from the right, and sure enough, we are. Mind you, the right had been trying to erect a cult of personality around the "Great Communicator" from the day he left office. Even before the meat stopped twitching, the right was promoting a scheme where every state would have a town renamed after Reagan ("Reagangrad", anyone?) and they wanted Reagan to replace FDR on the dime. They had renamed an airport after him (obsolete and often shrouded in fog, which was apt) and there is an aircraft carrier named for him. No space shuttles or Marine barracks, though.

Now that he’s officially dead, I imagine there will be schemes where the GOP will offer cash prizes to people who name their children "Ronald Wilson" ("But Mom, I’ve been Fred for 42 years. I don’t WANT to change my name!") and putting Reagan’s face on the flag and gawd knows what else.

Fade Out 4/20/04 The unraveling of the Putsch junta seems to be proceeding in earnest now.

It seems like another jarring revelation, another major setback, more bad news seems to be coming out on an hourly basis. It’s nearly impossible to keep track.

Today, the junta wasn’t even trying to deal with the ramifications of Woodward’s new book. The central figure in the book is Colin Powell, who was brutally frank in discussing his doubts and reservations about the whole Iraq adventure going back to November of 2001. They sent Condi out to protest some of the milder charges contained in Woodward’s book, but let’s face it: nobody is listening to her any more. The fiasco at the 9/11 commission pretty much finished off her credibility. Woodward’s book comes on the heels of the statement by the British ambassador to America that Putsch was plotting to attack Iraq days after 9/11. That in turn comes days after Clarke’s testimony before the 9/11 panel, which in turn came on the heels of his book, which contained damaging information, which in turn came right after Kevin Phillips’ book which cast severe doubt, not only on Putsch’s priorities, but his very loyalty to America.

"Almost Nothing" 3/30/04 I was at a fundraising dinner the other night, and found myself seated next to retired nine-term Congressman from Oregon, Les AuCoin. AuCoin was speaking at a fundraiser for the local Democrats, and nowadays is a professor of political science at Southern Oregon University and works part time as a political commentator (and a superb one) at the local NPR affiliate, Jefferson Public Radio.

I looked him right in the eye and asked, "Are things in Washington as bad as they appear?"

Clarke 3/23/04 The Putsch campaign was in a shambles today as the allegations made by Richard Clarke about Putsch’s anti-terrorism efforts formed a big mushroom cloud over the White House. Of course, the right wing spin doctors, who never sleep, were frantically cranking out excuses and rationalizations and smears as fast as they could.

My personal favorite was a quote from Richard Clarke’s letter of resignation, dated January 20, 2003: "It has been an enormous privilege to serve you these last 24 months. I will always remember the courage, determination, calm, and leadership you demonstrated on September 11th."

"Lucky" 2/20/04 When I read Ann "Thrax" Coulter’s essay on Max Cleland, war hero and former Senator, I shook my head in disgust and realized that this would be my next essay, and that it would pretty much write itself.

Except, to my surprise, it didn’t. The sense of revulsion and disgust and outrage was pretty close to universal, and Republicans as well as Democrats were attacking Coulter for her vile words. I looked at various editorials, all saying pretty much the same things I wanted to say, and realized that I wasn’t going to say anything that wasn’t obvious and redundant. She’s a vicious, nasty bitch who brought shame and disgrace down upon her head and the heads of those who support her. How could anyone say a man was "lucky" for losing three limbs while in the service of his country? Even more appalling were the bare-faced lies that accompanied that paragraph; that he was picking up a grenade while on a beer run, not anywhere near a combat zone, and if it had happened at Fort Dix instead, he would be no hero.

AWOL 2/14/04 The White House has a tacit tradition, going back to the days of the Roosevelt administration, of releasing news that they think will have negative political repercussions on Fridays, preferably in the afternoon. The reason for this is that Saturday’s newspaper is the one least read. By releasing a news story at a time when most people are packing for a weekend ski trip, or spending a day working in the yard, or other forms of recreation, the exposure the story gets is minimized.

Thus it was that the administration released George W. Putsch’s military records at 5:25 on a Friday afternoon, just 24 hours after refusing to commit to a release of the medical records any time soon.

At first, everyone thought it was just another incredibly blatant and bare-faced lie from an administration that has made an art form, not to mention a national policy, of blatant and bare-faced lies.

It's all the Democrat's Fault 1/27/04 It’s always easy to tell when some grandiose scheme or another has blown up in the faces of the right wingers who promoted it in the first place. They not only disown said scheme; they start blaming it on Democrats.

Hours after retired chief U.S. weapons inspector David Kay came out and said that he no longer believed that Iraq had stockpiles of hidden weapons of mass destruction, a curious thing happened.

On Usenet, we have a group of refugees from Newsmax and the GOP who live for nothing but to spin everything they can Putsch’s way. One of my readers, Mad Cat, ingeniously named this group "The Chimp Pimps," and I do wish he would stop coming up with lines like that when I’m sipping my morning coffee. This keyboard is shot.

Putsch: Blame Clinton 1/1404

Just when you thought the right wing and their fearless leader, that Yellow Pose of Texas, George W. Fustercluck of the White Feather, couldn’t get any dumber, they find a way.

In the aftermath of the sensational charges in Ron Suskind’s book, "The Price of Loyalty" that Paul O’Neill saw Putsch as little more than a potted plant, Putsch, apparently uncued, told the complaisant media that the allegation that they were planning an attack on Iraq from Day One following the SC coup was no big deal, since Clinton was doing the same thing. Clinton, too, was for "regime change," Putsch announced grandly, or at least coherently.

Leaving aside the obvious tacit admission inherent in that particular statement, there was the question that none of the cringing dogs in the White House Press was willing to ask: "Did Clinton’s plans for regime change involve attacking, invading, and then occupying Iraq, killing over ten thousand people in the process and leaving our troops to be slowly bled dry by a home-grown resistance movement?"

Interesting Math 1/10/04 The new labor and unemployment figures are just out, and while the unemployment rate fell in December to 5.7 from 5.9 the month previous, you won’t hear the Republicans cheering much about this.

The reason is that the numbers surrounding the employed labor force show, once and for all, what a load of pure hooey the "unemployment rate" really is.

Q&A 12/19/03 The retired judge watched the video with the same professional attentiveness that he had used on thousands of defendants over dozens of years.

"He's lying." The tone, like the words themselves, was unequivocal. All that was missing was the gavel. The judge turned to me. "It's in his body language. He's lying. He knows he's lying.

"He's also afraid of the question. You can see the fear in his posture. When I see a defendant acting in that manner, I can usually make a good guess on what the jury is going to find."
Won't Get Fooled Again 11/19/03 If you look over recent polls, the results are surprising, and a bit perplexing. For example, in a poll just completed the other day, CBS News asked the question, ""In general, do you think the policies of the Bush Administration favor the rich, favor the middle class, favor the poor, or do they treat all groups the same?" (CBS News Poll. Nov. 10-12, 2003. N=1,000 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.) 63 percent said Putsch favored the rich. Nine percent said he favored the middle class. And only one percent said he favored the poor. If you assume that only 10% of Americans are rich, that means that about 40% of Americans who aren’t rich think he favors the rich at their expense – and support him anyway. Another 23% temporized, and said he treats all classes equally. You can be pretty sure that when a chunk of the population give that answer on a question where the majority are so clearly decided, it simply means they don’t have a clue, and are just giving what they consider a judicious answer but is in fact an utterly ignorant one.

Back at the end of September, CBS also asked its respondents, "Do you have confidence in George W. Bush's ability to deal wisely with an international crisis, or are you uneasy about his approach?" Putsch was trailing in that one by a 45-50 margin, and given the large number of US casualties and the damning CIA report that declared that the Resistance in Iraq had grown to an estimated 50,000, and the US stood to completely lose control (the actual phrase the CIA used) of the situation, it’s a wonder it wasn’t lower. Indeed, the White House realized that his domestic support threatened to crumble over that as casualties soared to well over 400 dead and at least 7,000 injured or otherwise disabled in the war. (That "otherwise disabled," consisting of thousands of troops with symptoms that sound suspiciously like they inhaled depleted uranium, may yet be the biggest lingering afterstory of the war.)

Jessica Lynch 11/10/03 Heroism is, quite often, a choice to do the right thing when it would be far easier to do nothing at all.

Private Jessica Lynch could have quite easily have smiled and waved to the cameras and let the money roll in, knowing that in a few months, public attention would have moved on and her life would revert to normal, or at least as normal as a retired media-created hero can expect to have.

It wouldn’t be a bad life. She would start out with a nice big grubstake that she could use to buy a house and a new car and plough the rest into a retirement fund and have a fairly comfortable life. And when she’s recognized, she can look forward to deferential cops not giving her a ticket for speeding, free meals at restaurants, and the occasional request to come to a junior high and give a lecture on patriotism. Not bad for a girl who joined the army only because she couldn’t get a job at the local supermarket and had to do SOMETHING.

Under God? 10/15/03 The Supreme Court is taking up the Newdow case. For anyone who doesn’t own an AM radio or cable TV, Michael A. Newdow is the lawyer who successfully sued the Elk Grove Unified School District over the use of the phrase "under God" in the pledge of allegiance.

But the fun is only beginning. Antonin Scalia, the Negative Stereotype of the Supreme Court, has recused himself. It was a given that Scaly was going to vote against Newdow no matter what, and the fact that he was foolish enough to give speeches on the Newdow case last winter meant that he pretty much had to recuse himself. The Court is trying to regain the legitimacy it lost in the Bush vs. Gore decision, and having Scaly sit in judgment on a case he had already tried in the press would have just made a bad situation even worse.

Hindenberg, Too 10/2/03 Bartcop, of course, was transported with ecstacy. The net wit, who started his career with an email periodical called "Rush Limbaugh, Lying Nazi Whore," gleefully predicted his already-busy site would get a record number of hits today. Chances are he did break his record, despite it being one of the longest issues he’s done in quite some time.

BC, of course, wasn’t alone. Liberals everywhere have hoped that someone would plant a creme pie in Radio Gasbag’s smug face, just as karmic response to all the demagoguery and attacks on the most powerless and downtrodden members of society by that sleek neo-fascist clown.

Limbaugh, in a cynical ploy by Disney/ABC/ESPN, had been hired as a "color commentator" for a football show on the sports network. Limbaugh knows little about football, but a lot of the droolers who listen religiously to his three hour daily rants on the radio are also football fanatics (funny how that works) and ESPN reasoned that a little of the Limbaugh sneers would boost the ratings. And in fact, it did, by 10%. Of course, that meant the market share went from minuscule all the way up to teeny-weeny, but that meant profits for Disney, and that was all that really mattered.

Stealing Home 9/16/03 It’s hard to tell which course this administration is following is more self-destructive. Foreign policy, domestic policy, or the budget. All seem designed to screw up America as much as possible.

No President, not even Ronald Reagan, willingly clung to a economic model that so clearly showed economic catastrophe for the country. We’ve seen an eight-trillion turnaround in the national budgetary picture for the next eight years or so, from a $5 trillion surplus to a $3 trillion deficit, and that’s not even counting the immense costs of our little adventures in Iraq and Afghanistan.

California Schemin' 9/8/03 After all the remarks about what a circus and a joke the California recall election is, the strangest damn thing has happened: the campaign has become issues oriented, with much of the media actually talking about what the leading candidates stand for, and a variety of thought among those candidates that voters can easily distinguish.

Oh, the circus atmosphere is still there; along with the porn star and the sleazy magazine publisher and the showbiz midget and all of that, there are a hundred or so dogged, earnest people striving to be heard on a variety of issues ranging from medical care to legalization of ferrets. But it’s shifted very much to the back burner.

As the debate last night made clear, there are six major candidates, plus Arnold Schwarzenegger. Arnie is limping along on name recognition, but it’s become clear that his campaign is an utter fiasco, and his role in this election is that of being the biggest clown.

Labor Day 2003 8/31/03 It’s Labor Day, and it’s time to take a quick look at the lot of the American worker.

Well, it’s pretty crappy. Not just the unemployment rates. Those exemplify pretty crappy, of course. Officially, it’s around 6.3%, and unofficially (counting the people who have given up looking for work and whose benefits have expired) it’s somewhere around 10.5%. It isn’t just the pay, which is lagging further and further behind the increases the top 1% of wage earners see. Although with discretionary income falling each year, many west European nations have caught or surpassed us. (Yes, Americans have higher wages and lower taxes than their European counterparts, but said counterparts don’t have to deal with such privatized taxes as health care, pensions, higher education, and so on.)

Quagmire 8/21/03 The NY Times, in an editorial the day after a bomb ripped apart the UN headquarters in Baghdad and killed at least 20 people, included the chief UN envoy, Sergio Vieira de Mello, noted the probable involvement of al Qaida and observed, "Yesterday's bombing of the United Nations headquarters in Baghdad was the latest evidence that America has taken a country that was not a terrorist threat and turned it into one."

There are different theories about who was responsible for the car bombing, of course. The FBI (and would someone explain just what the HELL the FBI is doing in Baghdad) has confidently pronounced that the bomb was a Soviet model, and stated it belonged to Saddam. Paul Bremer, viceroy of Baghdad, claimed it was al Qaida. American puppet Ahmad Chalabi thinks the deed was done by Iraqi Ansar al-Islam, which is a loose coalition of Moslems who aren’t either Ba’athists (Saddam’s people) or al Qaida, but who disapprove of American presence in Iraq on general principles.

Wham, Bam, Thank You, PAM! 8/1/03 Back many years ago (many, many years ago) National Lampoon had an article about a big national lottery held every holiday. People would pay fifty cents for a form, had to guess a number, and because the number fell within a fairly narrow range (600-800) , making the total something that millions of people would guess frequently, they had to guess 50 smaller numbers, all adding up to the total number. Each number stood for a particular state, and the total, obviously, was the entire US. The person who got all 51 numbers right would win a huge sum of money–ten thousand dollars or some such.

It was a real popular game. Families would get extra blanks so the kids could play, and would be riveted to the television and cheering or groaning as the numbers changed.

What were they betting on?

The number of highway auto accident deaths during the three day holiday period.

Bush lied, they died 7/23/03 The Republicans are leaning hard on their corporate buddies in the media to refuse to run an ad the Democratic Party has come up with. According to the AP, the ad "sharply questions Bush's veracity on Iraq's weapons."

Gosh, that’s so terribly unfair of the Democrats. I mean, aside from the fact that the weapons didn’t, er, quite exist, actually, and aside from the fact we’re pretty much stuck in Iraq, with no clearly defined goals and no exit strategy, and the poor bastards who went over there because Putsch told them it was the right thing to do can only hope they don’t get taken out by a road bomb.

The Republicans claim the ad is misleading because it forgets to mention that the intelligence on the so-called "Niger memo" which claimed Saddam was attempting to buy yellowcake uranium radioactives to make into nuclear weapons came from British intelligence. It’s not Putsch’s fault that he’s an incompetent fuck up; his buddy Tony gave him bad info, is all.

Arnie 7/14/03 There Arnie was, big as life, addressing a coven of Republicans in California, and discussing his potential gubernatorial bid, should the recall election succeed against Governor . . . um, er.

At which point Arnie slapped his fingers on his forehead, grinned sheepishly, and said. "Dis iz zo embarrassing; I cannot think of the name of the governor of California."

On one level, I could relate. Gray Davis isn’t the most memorable person ever to hold the governor’s chair. I can’t remember bad movies I’ve seen, like the one where Arnie acts like a robot. What was that called?

"Bring it On!" 7/4/03 I lived in a lot of different neighborhoods when I was a kid, and in a lot of different countries. The games were different, as were the rules for what was cool and what wasn’t, and there were language difficulties, even though the countries I lived in were all English-speaking. They don’t speak the same in London’s West End as they do in Brisbane, or Los Angeles.

But kids are kids, and the behavioral patterns and social/ecological niches were pretty much the same everywhere I lived. You had your brains, and your jocks, and your bullies, and your wimps. There was more to it then that, but those four genres of childhood were usually the easiest to spot, often within minutes. Even in the English preparatory school system where everyone wore uniforms and came from roughly the same social class, those types were easy to spot.

And a constant among all those places was the most irritating one of all, the wimp who wanted to be a bully. Other kids would tease him, and he would immediately burst into tears, and in a full rage, declare that he was going to tell, and his dad or big brother or some other protector, real or imagined, would come and make them all sorry they had made fun of him. Only rarely did such an authority figure turn up, and usually if that happened, everyone faded into the woodwork until the threat went away, whereupon everyone would emerge and pummel the wimp.

Scaly's Orbiting Dicta 6/28/03 For the Supreme Court, it was an astonishing week. That they came out with a flurry of decisions was expected, of course. They often do that in June, at the end of their term. But this court, hag-ridden with ideologues like Scalia, Thomas and Rehnquist, nevertheless came down solidly on the side of constitutional rights and fairness in nearly all the cases. They upheld affirmative action; they barred racially motivated Congressional reapportionments; they affirmed the right of the accused to effective and competent defense in a trial; they refused to entertain Nike’s bizarre notion that the company had a first amendment right to misrepresent itself (i.e., lie) in its promotional literature. They determined that no state could strike down the statute of limitations ex post facto. That was a tough one, since it indisputably let bad guys out of jail and caused heartbreak for victims. But it was nevertheless the right thing to do. Even on the most restrictive decision, that of internet filters in public libraries, the majority of the court agreed that adult patrons had the right to demand the filter be temporarily shut off while they were logged on.

And they struck down the sodomy laws on 14th amendment grounds and to preserve the right to privacy. On this one, they didn’t just ignore stare decisis; they reversed themselves. (They did the same partially in another case, backing away from the lunatic assumption that campaign contributions were free speech.)

H.L. Mencken forecasted Tom DeLay 6/7/03 Back some sixty years ago, H.L. Mencken, the brilliant curmudgeonish iconoclast, said in an interview, "It is one of my firmest and most sacred beliefs... that the government of the United States, in both its legislative and its executive arm, is ignorant, incompetent, corrupt, and disgusting... that the administration of justice in the Republic is stupid, dishonest, and against all reason and equity... that the foreign policy of the United States __ its habitual manner of dealing with other nations, whether friend or foe __ is hypocritical, disingenuous, knavish, and dishonorable... that the American people, taking one with another, constitute the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose_steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages... "

OK, I ‘ve got a higher opinion of the American people than Mencken does. They aren’t all serfs and goose-steppers.

WMDs and Taxes 6/4/03 During the months in which the White House propaganda machine was ramping up for an attack on Iraq, I figured there had to be some truth to the US claims that Saddam had illegal weapons. 

Aside from the fact that Saddam was a sleazy, murderous SOB who was surrounded by enemies largely of his own creation, and the fact that he wasn’t a moron, I figured he kept some handy just in case Israel, Iran, or Imerica got any funny ideas about coming in and taking Iraq’s oil. And of course, there’s the pervasive American notion that the only way to deal with others is by being armed to the teeth. He would keep weapons on hand for the same reason we keep some 12,000 nuclear warheads handy; Botswana might attack at any moment. Saddam shares that type of cringing paranoia with America’s worst. 
Liberation 4/30/03 Boy, we’re just liberating the hell out of the Iraqi people, aren’t we?

In addition to the liberations we had two weeks ago, we liberated a bunch more people in a town called Fallujah over the past two days. On the first day, we liberated either 13 (the US military count) or 17 (what the local hospital claimed). The US media, always willing to sacrifice accuracy for the sake of sounding authoritative, split the difference and declared the toll to be 15.

In addition to those liberated, an additional 75 were reminded that you can’t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs.

Then the next day, two more got liberated, apparently for complaining about the liberation exercises of the day before, and 15 more were given omelet recipes.

GOP a diseased party 4/22/03 If you’ve ever gone to FreeRepublic.com or lurked around Usenet, you know that it tends to attract the nastiest, nuttiest, and most virulent of right wingers. Along with the race baiting scumbags and creepy and vicious crypto anarchists, you have a broad selection of folks who consider anything not endorsed by Rush Limbaugh or Michael Savage to be liberal propaganda.

It’s not unusual to encounter quotes such as "The Islamic community has a cancer growing inside it, which hates Jews, hates freedom, and hates Western Society. The disease of Islam must be rectified. It’s kill or be killed."

Charming, is it not? The fruitloop who said that also came up with these howlers: "Because of the peace movement, we had the Holocaust," and "The Democratic Party is keeping the Ku Klux Klan alive, and if we’d listened to Southern Democrats who wanted peace in the Civil War, we’d still have slavery."

Dynamic Scoring 4/7/03 I’ve got the household budget all sorted out for the fiscal year starting May 1st. It looks like I’ll be able to put about $45,000 into paying off bills and saving for retirement, which is a lot better than last year, when the amount was less than half of that.

Of course, I’m factoring in a few extra things. For example, I’m assuming that the economy will grow by 4% next year, so my business will grow accordingly. I’m also assuming that income for all my clients will ALSO increase by 4% and they will spend a proportionate amount on me. I’m also assuming that the house will appreciate by at least 4%, and adding that to my income. But housing went up an extra 10% in our area last year, so maybe I better make that 14%.

Finally, I’m assuming that I’ll spend $10,000 this year on the lottery. While it would be reckless to assume that I will actually win any particular amount, I happen to know that the lottery pays off at the rate of 38%, and since the money that is going into the lottery is investment toward future growth, I don’t have to list it among my expenses, but can assume that the $3,800 the odds say I’ll get back can be counted in my expected income.

Maybe I should invest $50,000 in the lottery. Then I could retire two or three years earlier.

The Right and Your Rights 3/22/03

I get considerable feedback on the essays I write, and a surprisingly large majority of it is positive. I might joke that I wish I was a little old lady so the right wing would hate me as much as they seem to hate Helen Thomas and Granny D, but the fact is that like anyone, I like being praised more than I like being damned.

So you should probably take it with a grain of salt when I say that people who like my essays tend to be articulate, thoughtful, pleasant people with lively curiosity and good table manners, while people who don’t like my essays tend to be knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing hirsute oafs who fantasize that some day, Rush Limbaugh and Britney Spears will be married and produce a race of superior beings who will all look like Ollie North.

But I might be biased on the matter.

Clap me or no EU speech 3/12/03 It was the sort of news story where you get a couple of lines in, laugh in astonishment, and start over to make sure you got it right the first time. Then you read it again, just to make REALLY sure.

The English tabloid, the Mirror, is reporting that Putsch was planning to address the Parliament of the European Union in order to try to shore up some support for his proposed attack on Iraq, but that the idea was scuttled when the European Union refused to guarantee that Putsch would get a standing ovation from Parliament members when he strode in to begin his speech.

Irrationality 2/28/03 There’s a time slot on the Science Fiction channel that falls immediately between the end of their usual evening programming and the all-night infomercials, and in it, they’ve put a program that seems to exemplify the corresponding sense of transition quite well: "Crossing Over with John Edwards." Edwards runs the old scam of contacting dead relatives. He’s pretty good at it, and knows what the marks want. Therefore, you never hear him say something like, "George, your Aunt Sarah thought you were a mealy-mouthed asshole when you were alive, and she’s pretty ticked that you swiped her Limoges, so she sure as hell doesn’t want to have anything to do with you now that she’s comfortably dead." That would be bad for business.
The Lost Weekend 2/14/03 Yeah, America’s probably had worse weekends than the one just past. There was the time the Brits burned down Washington, for instance. That wasn’t too good. There was that time the south American mob almost greased Nixon. Most Americans found that pretty upsetting, although if they knew then what we know now, they might have been routing for the mob. There was the Tet offensive, and when the My Lai story broke. Pearl Harbor. Various civil war battles.

This weekend was different. No howling mobs, no cities in flames, no shots being fired. And we can all take solace in the fact that this time around, Nixon is still dead. The man most responsible for turning American politics into the vicious reactionary circus we see today is dead. There’s that, at least.

How Putsch killed Conservatism 2/5/03 Even before Putsch came along, the conservative movement in America was all but dead. It had been replaced over the prior 25 years by wildly radical right wingers, the screaming neo-fascists that infest our government today and are busily destroying free America.

There were a few tattered remnants of old-style conservatism left in the GOP in the late 90s. They still claimed to stand for state’s rights, small unobtrusive government, and a balanced budget, and often fought for constitutional amendments and laws that would uphold such notions.

Enter, Stage Right 1/23/03 Seems we have new friends.

Well, maybe not friends. Allies. That’s a lot more accurate. Allies. Figure that after this is over, we’ll go back to tearing each others’ throats out. But for now, we have a common cause. George has managed to keep one campaign slogan: he is a uniter, not a divider. EVERYBODY’S getting pissed at him.

So we have new allies.

I got my first inkling of this during the MLK day rally last week when I spotted a cop giving the demonstrators a genial wave. I was i