|
| |
Election 2008
Needless to say (so let's say it anyway), this will be the
site for essays specific to the race from mid April until Election Day.
| The Dirt Trail |
10/13/08 |
Usually, at this point, just 22 days
before the election, I’m at the point where I’m running out of things to
say about the campaigns and am looking around a bit desperately for
something non-political to write about, just to take a break and maybe
restart my brain. This time around, I had an essay about a kitten –
yes, a kitten, that’s what I’ve descended to – on the back burner ready
to go against the point where I couldn’t post one more Palin quote
without puking.
But of course, this year has been a little different. The worldwide
economic crash is huge, news that is once-in-a-lifetime, vast in its
implications. It has been so big that even the campaign for what is
arguably the most important election America has seen since 1932 has
been pushed to the side.
So: three weeks to go, and I’m looking for opportunities to write
about politics. Right now, the kitten’s not even on the horizon, even
though he is indisputably a very nice kitten.
Europe is effectively nationalizing their banks while US
“leadership” is dithering. Tick, tick, tick. That’s where the economy
stands. We’re at that point in a Roadrunner cartoon narrative where
we’re Wile E. Coyote, and we’ve just noticed a shadow forming around us,
bugged our eyes skyward, and opened a little paper parasol in an effort
to shield ourselves.
Paul Krugman just won the Nobel Prize for Economics. I posted
congratulations to his blog, noting that if elected, Obama was going to
need a really, really good economic advisor.
So let’s talk about the campaign. First, there’s the right wing
smear machine. Smearing isn’t limited to the right, and you can find
Democrats willing to swear that McCain caused the Forrestal accident, or
is actually not a citizen and not eligible to run for president, or
turned coward and traitor whilst being held captive in North Vietnam.
All three can be regarded, at best, as unprovable and more likely to be
politically motivated nonsense.
But the smears against Obama are organized, coordinated, carefully
planned, and crafted, and repeated, over and over. However, between the
huge distraction of the economy and Obama’s willingness to fight the
smears, they just aren’t gaining ground. |
| The Great
Debate |
10/7/08 |
Well, if anyone was looking for FDR to
manifest in tonight’s debate, they will just have to live with
disappointment. Both candidates spent more time taking campaign speech
potshots at one another, and neither had anything substantive to say
about the exploding economic crisis that is threatening to bring down
America.
Now, in fairness, it has to be noted that during the campaign of 1932,
FDR didn’t make any bold proposals. He didn’t talk about a New Deal, or
how he would make the government America’s biggest employer in order to
“prime the pump”. Instead, he spouted the same genial platitudes about
how America would muddle through and business would take care of
business that incumbent Herbert Hoover was saying. I’m sure if the
Republicans had someone running to replace Hoover that year, the
Republican wannabe would be doing the same thing, dealing with the grim,
scary realities by tossing rose petals and blowing kisses.
And, unfortunately, one of the grim realities of a presidential campaign
is that if you take too firm a view, speak too many specifics, lay out a
detailed plan, the opposition will use it to tear you apart, even as
they steal it. Doesn’t much matter which party; politics is politics.
As a result, nobody expected much from Franklin Delano Roosevelt when he
took office. He was seen as a bit of a buffoon with only vague ideas on
how to tackle the crisis, and it was expected among many that he would,
in a genial, vaguely avuncular way, preside over the disintegration of
the country.
So if you were watching the debate and losing hope, remember that it may
not be the candidates that are flawed, but the system they operate in.
One, both, or neither might be the next FDR. Or they might be
ineffectual in the face of looming national catastrophe, a James
Buchanan. |
| Veep Veep |
10/2/08 |
The most striking thing about the vice
presidential candidates’ debate is that neither of them actually blew
sky-high or had a complete melt-down on stage. With Joe Biden, the main
concerns were that he would either be too didactic, or made an
unscripted remark that would cause Obama embarrassment. He avoided that.
With Palin, the expectations were slightly lower. The Republicans were
hoping she wouldn’t be the serious embarrassment she had been in
interviews with Charles Gibson and even harmless little Katie Couric.
Well, let’s face it: things had kind of reached the point where
Republicans were reduced to hoping that she could field a question like
“Do you like dogs?” without fucking it all up.
By any conventional standard, Joe Biden was the clear winner of the
debate. He was knowledgeable without sounding wonkish, assertive without
being bullying, and open and human without appearing weak. And while he
sometimes nuanced the truth as a seasoned politician can do (for
example, talking about a surge in Afghanistan being opposed by American
commander General McKiernan, when the general, while opposing a
Baghdad-style “surge” nevertheless wanted a troop increase), he never
actually told a bare-faced lie. Sarah Palin did, most notably when she
characterized Obama’s tax plan as targeting “millions of small
businesses.” The tax would be on the income the owners get from the
business, and limited to individuals making over $200K. The businesses
themselves would see no tax increase.
Both candidates and moderator Gwen Ifill both tiptoed around the ongoing
financial crisis, mentioning it obliquely if at all. As a result, it was
the 800 pound gorilla in the room. |
| Debate I |
9/25/08 |
The debate went off after all, and it was
probably the best presidential debate we’ve seen since Nixon /Kennedy.
For one thing, there were follow-up questions from a competent
moderator. Anyone who remembers Charlie Gibson’s poor job of moderating
the second debate between Putsch and John Kerry will recognize that a
good moderator is essential to a good debate. Lehrer is a good
moderator.
Second, the two men were allowed – indeed, encouraged – to speak
directly to one another. They both had trouble with that in the first
half hour, something I attribute to the rules of debate in Congress,
where debaters address the chair or the body, and not each other. To a
degree, both were using material from their stump speeches, which also
doesn’t involve direct interaction with the other. Both managed it
sporadically as the debate continued.
Third, for the first time in almost 12 years, the Republican candidate
wasn’t a complete moron. Putsch was, is, and always will be an idiot. Al
Gore, confronted with a type of idiocy he probably hadn’t seen since
grade school, sighed in frustration. Ironically, that cost him, since
the spinmeisters were able to paint him as an intellectual elitist and
Putsch as the type of guy you could have a beer with. (Think about the
type of guys you like to have beers with. Would you hire any of them on
a bet? Let them take care of your kids? Control your finances? Run your
country?). McCain has his flaws, but he is not stupid, and he’s actually
good in debate.
So the first debate turned out to be one of the best we’ve seen in a
long time, and if I was scoring it on rounds of questions, then I would
give it to McCain on points. Part of it was the Ali tactic of
rope-a-dope, where he would just lean back against the rope and cover
up, and let his candidate throw ineffectual punches. In this case it was
a strong reliance on talking points. But where for Putsch, talking
points was all he had, McCain used them to rattle Obama and eat up the
clock while Obama wore himself down some. |
| The McCain
Speech |
9/3/08 |
I suspect the idea was to play good cop /
bad cop on the country. Palin would come out screeching fire and
brimstone, firing up the base with lurid tales of how all Democrats and
the media wanted to do was tax America out of existence and surrender to
any terrorist who would put up with America. The following night, McCain
would be the statesman-like voice of reason, emphasizing his ability to
reach across the aisle and work with all to the betterment of America.
With a more diverse audience to play off of than what the Republican
National Convention offered, it might have worked. Normal people prefer
to work with their fellows, and when they talk about “Country First”,
they mean the country, and not just a small pack of religious whacks and
various major corporations.
But there just weren’t enough normal people in the audience that McCain
faced tonight. Palin had given them their 40 minutes of hate the night
before, and they visualized a speech at the end of which they would
storm the booths, tear apart the media, and go out slaying Democrats
with the stripped femurs of their foes, ripping throats out with their
teeth, and maybe torching a few winos.
That would be the male delegates. The females were thinking more along
the lines of the Furies of Grecian myth, only decently dressed. |
| Obama's
Night |
8/28/08 |
For people expecting a grand spectacle, tonight’s show in Denver might have
been something of a let down. Beijing’s Bird Nest had far more entertainers,
more lavish sets and backdrops, a bigger lightshow, and fireworks that made any
fireworks show seen in America look weak.
Even people just expecting it to be the fourth night of a political convention
would have been underwhelmed. There was lots of confetti, and party stalwarts
wearing looks of dumb adoration, and lots of real pretty speechifying.
And yet, it was an utterly unforgettable event. There was a sense that something
completely out of the ordinary was happening, and that made this much more than
just a big political rally, or a half-game show.
I watched most of it on PBS, switching to Faux News immediately after Obama’s
speech. I caught only the tail-end of Al Gore’s speech, and a brief speech by
Joe Biden. Then came speeches from five ordinary people, two of them former
Republicans, explaining why they were supporting Obama. PBS, to their credit,
stayed with them, rather than pushing them into a background sound while gasbags
pontificated about what It All Meant. One of the speakers, a fellow named Barney
Smith, brought the house down by remarking, “I want a government that will put
Barney Smith ahead of Smith, Barney.”
Then came the standard bio film, except that, like so many things about Barack
Obama, it wasn’t all that standard at all. Some relatives were white. Some
weren’t. Some were American. Some weren’t. But they were all completely human,
and worked to make Obama a fully realized person.
Then came the speech. |
| "Yes He
Can..." |
8/27/08 |
After Hillary’s speech last night, no reasonable person would
conclude that the Clintons weren’t on board for the 2008 presidential campaign.
That didn’t stop the far right, and the corporate media lickspittles who give
them artificial life in a country that hates them. So for the past 22 hours, we
had been hearing about how Hillary wasn’t SPECIFIC enough in her praise of Obama.
Of course, if she had gotten into specifics, the right would have put thousands
of manhours into combing through every public utterance she ever made in hopes
of finding something she said about Obama that might even be construed as
slightly different from what she said in the speech.
But, they whined, she could have said that about anyone who was the party
nominee. And of course, that’s exactly true. She said the things that she said
to show that she fully supported her party’s nominee.
Then Bill Clinton spoke tonight. The right was so busy watching for any signs of
a lack of party unity with Hillary they totally forgot that in many ways, Bill’s
voice in the party is even stronger than Hillary’s.
One reason for that is that they have spent years assuming that because they
hate Bill Clinton, everyone else must, as well. I just love mentioning to them
that on the day after the House impeached Bill Clinton, his popularity was above
70%, and it stayed will above 55% until he left office.
Bill Clinton was a strong president who brought America eight years of relative
peace, and an unparalleled economic boom, and people remembered that. |
| Hillary's Big
Speech |
8/26/08 |
About half way through her 30 minute speech at the convention
tonight, Hillary looked out over the sea of supporters in the arena – nearly but
not quite half the delegates there – and said, “Were you in this campaign just
for me?”
That was the exact moment that any worries I had that she would hold back,
perhaps vacillate just enough to leave doubts in the minds of her supporters
about going with Obama, that was the exact moment those concerns vanished.
That was the moment she told her supporters that what it was about, what it had
always been about, was far more important than her.
The right had been pumping up the notion that Hillary might not only be grudging
in her praise of Obama, but might even openly sabotage him. A couple of real
dreamers imagined that she might try at the last minute to turn the floor
nomination process the following night into a real vote, a real fight.
I wasn’t worried about that. If she had done something so stupid–and she is not,
by any stretch of the imagination, a stupid woman–she would have been as big a
pariah in the Democratic Party as Zell Miller or Joe Lieberman. If she was seen
in any way to be sabotaging Obama’s chances, I think even many of her supporters
would have turned on her. |
| A Ruckus in the
McCain Campaign |
8/26/08 |
Is Uncle Ruckus working in the McCain
campaign as his advisor on Negro Affairs or something?
Uncle Ruckus is perhaps the most demented character on TV, a large,
slovenly black man who absolutely detests all black people and worships
the white man’s god, Ronald Reagan. He is virulently racist, and will
spout lines like “That’s a fine pair of pickaninnies you’s got there” or
“Just because you is half white doesn’t mean you isn’t all nigrah.”
If you’re shaking your head and going, “Whoa! I haven’t seen anything
like THAT on American television!” the answer is that he’s a character
in “Boondocks,” a late night cartoon on the Cartoon network, produced by
Aaron McGruder, who also did the comic strip of the same name and based
on the same characters – minus, of course, Ruckus, who would have been a
bit much for newspaper editors to handle. The cartoon network, late at
night, has some of the boldest and most original social satire to be
found. Strange as it seems.
If Ruckus was a McCain advisor, he might say something like, “Senator,
you know and I know that that boy you’re running against ain’t nothing
but an uppity high-yellow who’s learned to hide his inner nigger.” He
would discourse on how Obama is “passin’ in both directions at once” and
explain to McCain that if he wanted to get some of the black vote
(“Although gawd knows why you would want it, it ain’t worth shit”), he
was going to have to work on his “nigger cred.” |
| Three
Point Tour |
7/25/08 |
It may be a while before John McCain pushes Barack
Obama to take a dare again.
For the past several weeks, he had been hammering home the point that
Obama didn’t have much in the way of foreign policy experience. It was a
legitimate claim, and McCain’s people were making the most of it,
putting up a day clock on their website to show how long it had been
since Obama had visited Iraq, and McCain himself taunted Obama,
challenging him to take a tour of the middle east and to talk to our
allies so he would know what was really going on over there.
It seemed a safe enough tactic. McCain doubtlessly believed that Obama
would privately share his conviction that the Illinois Senator was a
lightweight in foreign policy, and would avoid going over to the
occupied areas and saying or doing something that would either show he
didn’t know what he was talking about, or better still, having a
“Dukakis-in-the-tank” moment in which he would look ridiculous trying to
show off non-existent military credentials.
Then, too, there was the fact that presidential candidates rarely left
the country at ALL during the heat of the campaign, let alone on a
week-long, highly-publicized tour. In terms of getting votes, Enid,
Oklahoma would be more fertile grounds than all of Germany and France
combined. The conventional wisdom was that truculent voters would be
wondering why he was sucking up to a buncha damn furriners when there
were red-blooded Americans right here demanding his attention.
The tour turned out to be a disaster, not for Obama, but for McCain. It
was supposed to show that Obama would be out of his league dealing with
heads of state. He wasn’t. It was supposed to show that he put politics
ahead of the troops, and the troops resented it. They didn’t. And it was
supposed to give McCain the opportunity to second guess Obama, and
suggest better ways he might have handled the situations that Obama
bobbled.
Except Obama didn’t bobble any. |
| It May be Over |
5/6/08 |
At Hillary Clinton’s victory speech in
Indiana, Bill Clinton looked decidedly downcast. Chelsea Clinton was off
camera, but BBS presenter Katty Kaye reported that she looked on the
verge of tears. There was a telling moment in her “victory speech” when
she said, “I win, he wins, he wins, I win. No matter what happens, I
will work for the nominee of the Democratic party because we must win in
November. And I know that Senator Obama feels the same way.” That sounds
more like a concession speech, and it may well be one.
I suspect a lot of people will go to bed tonight convinced that Hillary
did win Indiana, and perhaps she did. But normally, when there is a 4
point margin between candidates with 87% of precincts in, it’s time to
release the balloons, give the speech, and congratulate the loser on a
fine effort.
But it’s not quite over in Indiana. Two counties have no returns at all.
One of them is Lake County, which adjoins the small hamlet of Chicago,
in Obama’s “home state” of Illinois. It features the medium-sized city
of Gary, Indiana. It’s expected to go heavily for Obama. The other is
Union County, just up the road from Cincinnati.
Correction: Lake County just reported well after midnight their time,
and with 28% of precincts counted, Obama is leading 75%-25%.
No, Indiana isn’t settled yet. |
| 435-305 |
4/22/08 |
Well, Rush Limbaugh’s big push to have
Republican supporters switch allegiance and vote for Hillary in
Pennsylvania in order to keep the race going had a profound effect.
The polls from the political analysts suggest that Hillary would win by
11 points. With about 80% of the vote counted, she is leading by ...
ten. Back when Rush first suggested voting for her, she still led in the
state by about twenty points.
So the big dittohead boost didn’t materialize, and while she won by just
enough to stay in the race, she faces dwindling donations as her
campaign falls ten million in debt.
She did win, and she’ll get a boost from that, a small bounce in the
polls which may or may not help her in Indiana two weeks from now.
(North Carolina isn’t really in play, with Obama enjoying a solid 20
point lead there). But she only gained about fifteen delegates on Obama.
But after tonight, she’ll still need 430 or so delegates in order to win
the nomination, and Obama only needs about 310. No matter what happens
in the remaining primaries, Obama will go to the convention with the
most voter-chosen delegates. So Pennsylvania served only to keep Hillary
alive, but not improve her position. |
| A Lazy Breeze |
4/16/08 |
The Scots have a benign sounding term for
what is actually a rather nasty thing. “A lazy breeze.” A lazy breeze is
a wind so cold and bitter that it goes through you, rather than around
you.
About now Republicans, CEOs, and Hillary Clinton must be shivering and
cursing the way the wind is blowing.
For the second time in three weeks, right wingers exalted that something
had happened in the Barack Obama campaign that would destroy his run for
the Presidency. The first was the Reverend Wright and his incendiary
remarks about relations between America and her black population. The
second was Obama’s “bitter” remark last week.
Faux and right wing talk radio tried pile-driving it, of course, but not
many people outside of their little circle of friends pay much attention
to what they have to say these days, and that means about 2% of all
Americans.
The mainstream media, dutiful whores to the GOP, don’t even bother
trying to hide their Republican servitude these days. Even Dana Milibank,
no friend to liberal politicians, was taken aback, writing, “So much for
the liberal media. John McCain and Barack Obama both appeared before the
nation's newspaper editors yesterday. The putative Republican
presidential nominee was given a box of doughnuts and a standing
ovation. The likely Democratic nominee was likened to a terrorist. At a
luncheon for the editors hosted by the Associated Press, AP Chairman
Dean Singleton quizzed Obama about whether he would send more troops to
Afghanistan, where ‘Obama bin Laden is still at large?”’ |
|
Elitism! |
4/13/08 |
Back when I was 11 and in Southern
California, a time of a too-slowly dying pope and a too-rapidly living
president, I had a liberal aunt who loved Adlai Stevenson. As a part of
her (eventually successful) drive to liberalize me, she had me listen to
some of his speeches. They were on scratchy LPs, mono, and of dicey
sound quality. Combined with Stevenson’s still-unfamiliar American
accent, they made understanding the speeches a bit of a burden.
Part of the problem was that I was only 11. Stevenson, unlike most
politicians, spoke as an adult to adults. Compared to what we have
today, so did Eisenhower. Neither of them were aiming for audiences that
might be mentally challenged by the Teletubbies. But Adlai had a wit
that reminded me of my hero, Winston Churchill. And the Cuban missile
crisis the year before had taught me that the boring stuff on the front
page of the newspaper could kill me if I wasn’t paying attention.
My aunt told me of his legendary decision about letting cats roam free*,
and the time someone told him that he was sure to “get the vote of every
thinking man” in the U.S. Stevenson replied, “Thank you, but I need a
majority to win.”
Years later, as Reagan ascended and America began a decline, I heard
some of those speeches again. He didn’t use sound bites, he didn’t use
race or economics or religion to bait and entice his listeners or stir
up their anger against commies or beatniks. He spoke to them as if they
were thinking adults capable of evaluating the facts and drawing their
own thought-out conclusions.
|
| |
|
|
|